Recommended procedures: Difference between revisions

From Relion
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The following is what we typically do for each new data set for which we have a decent initial model.  
The following is what we typically do for each new data set for which we have a decent initial model.  


(If you don't have an initial model: perform RCT, tomography+sub-tomogram averaging, or if you really need to common-lines procedures in a different program).
(If you don't have an initial model: perform RCT, tomography+sub-tomogram averaging, or (if you really need to) common-lines procedures in a different program).


== Getting organised ==
== Getting organised ==

Revision as of 17:01, 25 January 2013

The following is what we typically do for each new data set for which we have a decent initial model.

(If you don't have an initial model: perform RCT, tomography+sub-tomogram averaging, or (if you really need to) common-lines procedures in a different program).

Getting organised

Save all your micrographs in one or more subdirectories of the project directory (from where you'll launch the RELION GUI). We like to call these directories "Micrographs/" if all micrographs are in one directory, or "Micrographs_15jan13/" and "Micrographs_23jan13/" if they are in different directories (e.g. because they were collected on different dates). If you for some reason do not want to place your micrographs inside the RELIOn project directory, then inside the project directory you can also make a symbolic link to the directory where your micrographs are stored.

Particle selection

Our favourites are Ximdisp and e2boxer.py. Be careful at this stage: you are probably better at getting rid of bad/junk particles than any of the classification procedures below! So spend a decent amount of time on selecting good particles, be it manually or (semi-)automatically.

2D class averaging

We like to use 3D class averaging to get rid of bad/junk particles in the data set. Apart from choosing a suitable particle diameter (make sure you don't cutt off any real signal, but try to minimise the noise around your particle as well), the most important parameters are the number of classes (K) and the regularization parameter T. For cryo-EM we typically have at least 150-250 particles per class, so with 3,000 particles we would not use more than K=20 classes. Also, to limit computational costs, we rarely use more than say 150 classes even for large data sets. For negative stain, one can use fewer particles per class, say at least 50-100. For cryo-EM, we typically use T=2; while for negative stain we use values of 1-2. We typically do not touch the default sampling parameters.

Most 2D class averaging runs yield some classes that are highly populated (look for the data_model_classes table in the model.star files for class occupancies) and these classes typically show nice, relative high-resolution views of your complex in different orientations. Besides these good classes, there are often also many bad classes: these are typically bad/junk particles. Because junk particles do not average well together there are often few particles in each bad class, and the resolution of the corresponding class average is thus very low. These classes will look very ugly! We then use awk (see the [[FAQs#How_can_I_select_images_from_a_STAR_file.3F | FAQs page] to make a smaller STAR file, from which all the bad classes are excluded. The reasoning behind this is that if particles do not average well with the others in 2D class averaging, they will also cause trouble in 3D refinement.

Depending on how clean our data is, we some times repeat this process 2 or 3 times. Be patient, as 2D class averaging is remarkably slow in RELION... However, having a clean data set is an important factor in getting good 3D classification results.

3D classification

Once we're happy with our data cleaning in 2D, we almost always perform 3D classification. Remember: ALL data sets are heterogeneous! It is therefore always worth checking to what extent this is the case in your data set. At stage stage we use our initial model for the first time. Remember, if it is not reconstructed from the same data set in RELIOn or XMIPP, it is probably NOT on the correct grey scale. Also, if it is not reconstructed with CTF correction in RELION or it is not made from a PDB file, then one should probably also set "Has reference been CTF corrected?" to No. We prefer to start from relatively harsh initial low-pass filters (often 50-60 Angstrom), and typically perform 25 iterations with a regularization factor T=4 for cryo-EM; and T=2-4 for negative stain. (But remember: classifying stain is often a pain due to variations in staining.) For cryo-EM, we prefer to have at least (on average) 5,000-10,000 particles per class. For negative stain, fewer particles per class may be used. We typically do not touch the default sampling parameters, except for icosahedral viruses where we may start from 3.7 degrees angular sampling and we perform local searches from 0.9 degrees onwards.

After classification, similar classes may be considered as one. In rare cases with large data sets, one may choose to further classify separate classes from an initial classification.